UPDATED: 09-19-26 13:31 PDT

hoop Miss. St
  
Miss. St              
W-L: ( 3- 0) PR = 96.6166

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 905 H UL Monroe ( 0- 3, 77.5) 61- 13 912 A Minnesota ( 1- 2, 85.1) 38- 13 919 A So. Carolina ( 2- 1, 89.5) 41- 34 926 H Missouri ( 3- 0, 92.8) 1003 H Alabama ( 3- 0, 99.2) 1017 A LSU ( 2- 1, 93.5) 1024 H Oklahoma ( 2- 1, 91.0) 1031 A Texas ( 3- 0, 95.7) 1107 H Vanderbilt ( 3- 0, 88.4) 1114 H Auburn ( 2- 1, 89.4) 1121 H Tennessee Tech 1127 A Ole Miss ( 3- 0, 95.7)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   905 H UL Monroe              61-13      48    20           0.00
   912 A Minnesota              38-13      25    11    ++     4.46
   919 A So. Carolina           41-34       7     6           0.85

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   912 A Minnesota              38-13      25    11    ++     4.46

Miss. St Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Boston Col Miss. St   Miss. St
California Miss. St   Miss. St
Clemson Miss. St   Miss. St
Duke Miss. St   Miss. St
Florida St Miss. St   Miss. St
Georgia Tech Miss. St   Miss. St
Louisville Miss. St   Miss. St
Miami Miss. St   Miss. St
No. Carolina Miss. St   Miss. St
NC State Miss. St   Miss. St
Pittsburgh Miss. St   Miss. St
SMU Miss. St   Miss. St
Stanford Miss. St   Miss. St
Syracuse Miss. St   Miss. St
Virginia Miss. St   Miss. St
Va. Tech Miss. St   Miss. St
Wake Forest Miss. St   Miss. St
Army Miss. St   Miss. St
Charlotte Miss. St   Miss. St
Ea. Carolina Miss. St   Miss. St
Fl. Atlantic Miss. St   Miss. St
Memphis Miss. St   Miss. St
Navy Miss. St   Miss. St
No. Texas Miss. St   Miss. St
Rice Miss. St   Miss. St
So. Florida Miss. St   Miss. St
Temple Miss. St   Miss. St
Tulane Miss. St   Miss. St
Tulsa Miss. St   Miss. St
UAB Miss. St tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Miss. St
UTSA Miss. St   Miss. St
Arizona Miss. St   Miss. St
Arizona St Miss. St   Miss. St
BYU Miss. St   Miss. St
Baylor Miss. St   Miss. St
Cincinnati Miss. St   Miss. St
Colorado Miss. St   Miss. St
Houston Miss. St   Miss. St
Iowa State Miss. St   Miss. St
Kansas Miss. St   Miss. St
Kansas St Miss. St   Miss. St
Oklahoma St Miss. St   Miss. St
TCU Miss. St   Miss. St
Texas Tech Miss. St   Miss. St
UCF Miss. St   Miss. St
Utah Miss. St   Miss. St
We. Virginia Miss. St   Miss. St
Illinois Miss. St   Miss. St
Indiana Miss. St   Miss. St
Iowa Miss. St   Miss. St
Maryland Miss. St   Miss. St
Michigan Miss. St   Miss. St
Michigan St Miss. St   Miss. St
Minnesota Miss. St Miss. St  
Nebraska Miss. St   Miss. St
Northwestern Miss. St   Miss. St
Ohio State Miss. St   Miss. St
Oregon Miss. St   Miss. St
Penn State Penn State   Penn State
Purdue Miss. St   Miss. St
Rutgers Miss. St   Miss. St
UCLA Miss. St   Miss. St
USC Miss. St   Miss. St
Washington Miss. St   Miss. St
Wisconsin Miss. St   Miss. St
Florida Int Miss. St   Miss. St
J'ville St Miss. St   Miss. St
Kennesaw St Miss. St   Miss. St
Liberty Miss. St   Miss. St
La. Tech Miss. St   Miss. St
Mid. Tenn. Miss. St   Miss. St
N. Mexico St Miss. St   Miss. St
Sam Houston Miss. St   Miss. St
UTEP Miss. St   Miss. St
We. Kentucky Miss. St   Miss. St
Mass. Miss. St   Miss. St
Notre Dame Notre Dame   Notre Dame
UConn Miss. St   Miss. St
Akron Miss. St insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Miss. St
Ball State Miss. St   Miss. St
Bowl'g Green Miss. St   Miss. St
Buffalo Miss. St   Miss. St
Ce. Michigan Miss. St   Miss. St
Ea. Michigan Miss. St   Miss. St
Kent St Miss. St insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Miss. St
Miami (OH) Miss. St   Miss. St
No. Illinois Miss. St   Miss. St
Ohio Miss. St   Miss. St
Toledo Miss. St   Miss. St
We. Michigan Miss. St   Miss. St
Air Force Miss. St   Miss. St
Boise St Miss. St   Miss. St
Colorado St Miss. St   Miss. St
Fresno St Miss. St   Miss. St
Hawai'i Miss. St   Miss. St
Nevada Miss. St   Miss. St
New Mexico Miss. St   Miss. St
San Diego St Miss. St   Miss. St
San Jose St Miss. St   Miss. St
UNLV Miss. St   Miss. St
Utah St Miss. St   Miss. St
Wyoming Miss. St   Miss. St
Oregon St Miss. St   Miss. St
Wash. St Miss. St   Miss. St
Alabama Alabama   Alabama
Arkansas Miss. St   Miss. St
Auburn Miss. St   Miss. St
Florida Miss. St   Miss. St
Georgia Miss. St   Miss. St
Kentucky Miss. St   Miss. St
LSU Miss. St   Miss. St
Missouri Miss. St   Miss. St
Oklahoma Miss. St   Miss. St
Ole Miss Miss. St   Miss. St
So. Carolina Miss. St Miss. St  
Tennessee Miss. St   Miss. St
Texas Miss. St   Miss. St
Texas A&M Miss. St   Miss. St
Vanderbilt Miss. St   Miss. St
App State Miss. St   Miss. St
Arkansas St Miss. St   Miss. St
Coastal Car. Miss. St   Miss. St
Georgia So. Miss. St   Miss. St
Georgia St Miss. St   Miss. St
J. Madison Miss. St   Miss. St
Louisiana Miss. St   Miss. St
Marshall Miss. St   Miss. St
Old Dominion Miss. St   Miss. St
So. Miss Miss. St   Miss. St
So. Alabama Miss. St   Miss. St
Texas St. Miss. St   Miss. St
Troy Miss. St   Miss. St
UL Monroe Miss. St Miss. St  
Delaware Miss. St   Miss. St
Missouri St Miss. St   Miss. St

PowerWise = 132


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 2.93

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   1 H UL Monroe       ( 0- 3, 77.5)    61-13      -22.38       6.36      -1.00         0.98            10.45
   1 A Minnesota       ( 1- 2, 85.1)    38-13      -14.82      13.91       1.00         0.98            29.10
   1 A So. Carolina    ( 2- 1, 89.5)    41-34      -10.43      18.30       1.00         0.98            37.66
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                        77.21

winning pts = 77.2099 losing points = 0.0000

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------